🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has announced it is pursuing compensation valued at $230 billion against the securities depository Euroclear. This move constitutes a clear warning by the Kremlin against proposals to utilize frozen Russian sovereign assets to aid Ukraine.

The Legal Claim

According to accounts in Russian news outlets, the monetary authority initiated a claim last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This figure is equivalent to the aforementioned $230 billion demand.

European Union officials will decide later this week regarding a plan to leverage approximately €210 billion in immobilized Russian state funds. This scheme entails providing Ukraine with a substantial loan to fund its military and economic needs.

The vast majority of these funds, totaling €185 billion, reside at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. This institution serves as the main keeper for the Russian frozen sovereign wealth.

A Clash Over Legality

European Union authorities have argued that their proposal is on solid legal ground. They argue rests on the fact that ownership of the state assets remains with Russia, despite being it was frozen in European countries shortly after the full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

The Russian government, however, has labeled any utilization of the assets as illegal appropriation. Authorities have threatened reciprocal measures, such as seizing European corporate holdings within Russia.

Kirill Dmitriev, who has assumed a prominent role in diplomatic talks, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and regain its funds. He warned that the European Union, the euro, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the plan.

Geopolitical Maneuvering

With statements seen as an effort to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev described the proposal as "a vicious assault on property rights and the global financial system established by the United States."

Euroclear declined to comment on the latest lawsuit. It has previously noted it is contending with more than 100 lawsuits in Russian jurisdictions.

Enforcement Challenges

While judges in EU countries are unlikely to recognize rulings from Russian courts, experts expect Moscow to seek enforcement in countries with stronger ties to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities could try to implement a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly states, provided that relevant holdings can be identified," stated a legal expert from an international firm.

EU Countermeasures

European authorities indicated they are developing steps to discourage other countries from assisting any Russian legal action against EU entities. They are also crafting protections to protect EU member states with assets in Russia from what they call "illegal expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

According to the complex scheme, the EU would issue an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the proceeds generated from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's legal claim on the underlying funds would stay untouched.

Ukraine would solely be obligated to return the money in the event that Russia agreed to pay compensation for the vast damage caused during the nearly four-year war.

Other Funding Ideas

The Belgian government, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to consider an alternative approach for financing Ukraine. This entails common EU debt issuance to secure a loan, using unallocated funds within the European budget.

This alternative move, however, demands unanimity among all 27 EU countries. Hungary's government, considered aligned with the Kremlin, has previously expressed its objection.

Commenting on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, a senior official, described the reparations loan as "the strongest option" for aiding Ukraine. "The reparations loan is based on the Russian frozen assets, which means it doesn't come from our taxpayers' money, which is also significant," she stated. "Furthermore, it sends a clear message that if you cause all this damage to another country, you have to pay for the rebuilding."