🔗 Share this article

The beluga known as Jelly Bean’s daughter Bertie Botts is an charming small “sweetheart”. The whale Orion – called “Onion Ring” – is a big but very loyal friend. Another whale, Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and wiggles like a wiggly creature. Lillooet is the “biggest cuddle bug” with a gentle spirit.

Thirty enclosed beluga whales in a Canadian entertainment facility have been entangled in a disagreement between a shuttered park, public officials and welfare campaigners.

But those closest to the whales say the heated controversy over their destiny often fails to consider the individual traits of the whales who, after growing up in enclosed habitats, have been carefully observed by the humans who see them each day.

After the national authorities blocked the transfer of the belugas to a foreign facility, the controversial amusement park near Niagara Falls where they are held threatened to euthanize them unless the authorities funds the cost of their care. The nation’s fisheries minister has rejected that demand, placing the thirty whales in an dangerously unstable situation.

Highly Cognitive Sea Creatures

Scientists say that beluga whales’ neural makeup, along with their sound replication, intellectual tasks and communal behavior indicate they are deeply intelligent animals – something one caretaker observed first-hand.

She spent several years as a beluga trainer, a position that required gaining confidence of the aquatic animals.

“Building up those connections over time takes a lot of dedication and a lot of affection. At the start, they’re very cautious of you,” she said. “Eventually, you gain shared confidence. And they start being more trusting with you. It’s just so extraordinary and fulfilling.”

The trainer knew the whales were very smart, but she says she was nonetheless surprised by the subtleties and quirks in their characters. She formed a particular love for Eve and Cleopatra with opposing natures.

“One whale selected me. The other made me earn it,” she said. “They changed the way I perceive connection.”

Public Concerns and Deteriorating Conditions

Burgess’s interaction with the whales developed against a background of increasing societal concern to their confinement.

During her time at the park, seven belugas and the park’s one orca, the orca, passed away. In all, nineteen belugas have died at the park since recent years, a statistic which the facility links to age-related causes, but which advocates say points to the inadequate care in which they were housed.

The park did not admit visitors to the guests over the summer, but Burgess says she saw with her own eyes consequences of the closure. “Structural materials is deteriorating from the tanks because they’re degrading and not being fixed. The whales are curious and so they take pieces and move about with fragments in their jaws. It’s heartbreaking to see.”

The facility did not respond to a questionnaire, but in the past claimed: “The whales … get far higher quality veterinary services and around the clock attention than any individual in the United Kingdom, or anywhere else.”

Fate in Limbo and Potential Resolutions

The former employee was fired from the park in recent months following the passing of Eos, an unwell beluga the employees had to put down. She said the park believed information of the incident were disclosed to the press and she was fired soon after.

The lack of clarity over the whales’ fate has left Burgess and staff members in anguish. She says the facility’s ultimatum to euthanize its whales is a bargaining chip and is a “practically unfeasible” endeavor, adding any efforts to humanely kill even a single beluga would require “considerable manpower”, vehicles and specialized tools.

“There’s no way in hell the staff would ever do it,” she said.

She advocates for demands for the whales to be taken right away from the park, with its crumbling tanks and dwindling staff.

In the autumn, Canada’s fisheries minister denied a request to transfer the whales to an overseas location.

“Allowing the proposal would have meant a perpetual situation in confinement and a reversion to display for amusement,” the official commented. “As Canadians, we know that whales belong in the sea, not in tanks for our entertainment. I could not in good conscience permit an export that would perpetuate the situation these belugas have endured.”

But the former trainer said the official’s remarks indicate a broader lack of awareness of the facts of existence for belugas born in captivity.

“The people needs to grasp these are whales that have spent their whole lives in confinement and they will need human care for the foreseeable future,” she said. “Many just don’t realize that it’s not as simple as saying ‘shut it down’.”

Alternative Habitat and Ongoing Debate

As authorities attempt to find a resolution, suggestions have emerged, some of which have questionable practicality. A suggested plan called for the belugas to be released into the wilds of the Arctic – where whales are a primary resource of sustenance for Inuit communities.

A suggested sanctuary in the region of Nova Scotia, which recently received regulatory clearance, has shown to be most controversial. The planned facility, which includes a large area of protected cove, doesn’t yet exist. Proponents remain optimistic that it could eventually represent a long term resolution for a number of the whales.

But, the former trainer says, among staff she’s spoken with, there is “no trust there” about what she said is “only an untested concept” in the whales’ well-being.

Different voices say the possibility of a protected habitat indicates a broader global shift away from captive facilities and could represent a workable approach in the coming months.

An official, leader of the plan, said the facility will simulate the intellectual stimulation and nutrition the whales receive from caretakers, albeit in a more expansive environment. He said after the medical condition of whales is fully assessed, which could take months|an extended period|